Having just got back from a short holiday, I read a couple of books whilst I was away, the first of which I read on Kindle:
The premise of the book is that a young Amish girl, named Katie, gives birth in secret in the barn in the early morning, prays that God will make this go away and then passes out. She wakes up and a miracle has happened, the baby has disappeared. She goes back to bed hoping that this is the end to it all. Sadly, it is not. The body of the baby is found that morning hidden under blankets and when the police turn up, it is clear that Katie is the main suspect because although she denies having had a baby (she has hidden the pregnancy from everyone), her body gives her away and she is charged with the murder of her infant as all evidence points to the baby being smothered.
Katie's second cousin Ellie, a city lawyer suffering a personal crisis of her own, happens to be visiting their Aunt and she finds herself agreeing to be both counsel and guardian of Katie whilst the trial progresses, necessitating her living within the Amish community.
I liked the career crisis of Ellie coinciding with the personal crisis of Katie, but did not like the twist.
SPOILER do not read on if you intend to read the book.
At the end of the trial when we already have a satisfactory resolution, Katie's mother Sarah mentions in passing to Ellie that she murdered the baby. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever for Sarah to have killed her innocent grandchild, whether she felt she would lose another child (i.e. Katie, like she lost her son when her husband ostracized him due to his continuing education) or not, (the reasoning the author gives) as it is both against her religion to do harm to another and with the new grandchild, she would have been gaining a child (and a male one at that) to ease the pain of losing her son to the non-Amish world. It is so far out of the character that his been built up (her wishing to protect and keep her daughter) to have done this, especially as, if this were the case, she would have come forward when Katie was accused of murder.
To me, it felt added to the end for both shock value and extra wordage, rather than a genuine twist. Also, I think it would have made a better twist to use the pregnancy of Ellie being in jeopardy due to her likelihood of catching listeria as Katie did (the reason the jury found her not guilty of smothering her child), but there is no mention of Ellie even worrying about having milked the cows etc. when she goes into hospital scared that she might lose her baby. That would have been far more believable character-wise, would have added extra wordage (if that was what was needed) and tied up the loose ends nicely within the plot in a believable manner.
This error was a shame, as I really enjoyed the book otherwise. I loved the insight into the Amish way of life, the court and medical procedures that would be used in a trial of this nature and even the mentions of paranormal investigations. I would have preferred more of this, including more detail on the apparition of Katie's sister, rather than the way the author decided to go.
An out of character end to an otherwise enjoyable book. 6/10
Wednesday, 30 April 2014
Tuesday, 29 April 2014
Clecheaton Writers Group meeting 28 April 2014
Another successful meeting of the CWG last night where A, D, P and I were in attendance, N & L having sent their apologies.
We started by having a feedback session on the writing we are working on at the moment. A has been editing his children's novel (he shared the first three chapters with the Group for the feedback session). D has been working on a new MG children's story and arranging a visit to a forge for research purposes and I have been editing and have sent out my novel T to another publisher.
This moved us on to talking about agents and publishers and the feedback you may get. We discussed waiting times, which can range, but that three months seems the norm and when a manuscript would be ready for submission.
Several members of the CWG have signed up for a free OU creative writing course and I am sure the notes on this will be shared at future meetings for those members that could not join.
We then discussed plagiarism as I have recently read a post from a fellow blogger who has had his work plagiarised from a writers group member that he taught and has known for nine years. We all agreed this was terrible and that it did not seem to be in the realm of someone having a similar idea coincidentally, as is usually the case.
D and I then gave feedback on A's three chapters that he had shared. We both really enjoyed it and want to read more. We loved the similarities in tone to Hitchhikers Guide, Star Wars and Red Dwarf and that the description of the psychiatrist was suitably creepy. There were only a couple of small points in that I felt that a minor characters name jarred and we both felt that a little less backstory of the main character's father would work better and to drip feed the information in future chapters so that when the reveal comes, it is more satisfying for the reader.
D told the members about the HLF Literary Lunch that she and I stewarded for and this lead us on to a discussion about steampunk. She recommended the work of Phillip Reeve as a good example of the steampunk genre (Mortal Engine's in particular) and P recommended the websites www.steampunk.com and www.steampunkmagazine.com.
There was not time for a timed writing session, but we hope to rectify this at the next meeting. There are two spots open for the feedback session at the next meeting, scheduled for Monday 12 May 6-8pm at Cleckheaton Library. New members always welcome.
We started by having a feedback session on the writing we are working on at the moment. A has been editing his children's novel (he shared the first three chapters with the Group for the feedback session). D has been working on a new MG children's story and arranging a visit to a forge for research purposes and I have been editing and have sent out my novel T to another publisher.
This moved us on to talking about agents and publishers and the feedback you may get. We discussed waiting times, which can range, but that three months seems the norm and when a manuscript would be ready for submission.
Several members of the CWG have signed up for a free OU creative writing course and I am sure the notes on this will be shared at future meetings for those members that could not join.
We then discussed plagiarism as I have recently read a post from a fellow blogger who has had his work plagiarised from a writers group member that he taught and has known for nine years. We all agreed this was terrible and that it did not seem to be in the realm of someone having a similar idea coincidentally, as is usually the case.
D and I then gave feedback on A's three chapters that he had shared. We both really enjoyed it and want to read more. We loved the similarities in tone to Hitchhikers Guide, Star Wars and Red Dwarf and that the description of the psychiatrist was suitably creepy. There were only a couple of small points in that I felt that a minor characters name jarred and we both felt that a little less backstory of the main character's father would work better and to drip feed the information in future chapters so that when the reveal comes, it is more satisfying for the reader.
D told the members about the HLF Literary Lunch that she and I stewarded for and this lead us on to a discussion about steampunk. She recommended the work of Phillip Reeve as a good example of the steampunk genre (Mortal Engine's in particular) and P recommended the websites www.steampunk.com and www.steampunkmagazine.com.
There was not time for a timed writing session, but we hope to rectify this at the next meeting. There are two spots open for the feedback session at the next meeting, scheduled for Monday 12 May 6-8pm at Cleckheaton Library. New members always welcome.
Monday, 28 April 2014
Dancing on Ice
Last night we went to see the final night of the final tour of Dancing on Ice and what a fabulous night it was. Not only were the dancing stars entertaining, but the professionals were amazing.
The stars were Kyran Bracken (who won Series 2 in 2007 and won on the night with a flawless routine), Bonnie Langford (who came third in Series 1 in 2006), Gareth Gates (who came fourth in Series 3 in 2008), Suzanne Shaw (who won Series 3 in 2008), Ray Quinn (who won both in Series 4 in 2009 and in the final series), Hayley Tamaddon (who won Series 5 in 2010), Joe Pasquale (who came 6th in Series 8 in 2013) and Beth Tweddle (who won Series 8 in 2013).
All of the skating was wonderful and with added pyrotechnics and humour, and it was a lovely night out for all the family.
As it was the last night of the last tour, there were tears and speeches and this only added to the occasion.
Kyran Bracken deserved his win with Nina Ulanova, but Ray Quinn was a close second with his partner Maria Filippov, only let down by a fall during his energetic routine.
The other skating professionals partnered with the stars were Brianne Delcourt, Andrei Lipanov, Robin Johnstone, Matt Evers, Daniel Whiston and Lukasz Rozycki (Alexandra Schauman and Andy Buchanan completed the tally for the professional skaters). A beautiful routine with the professionals where the three girls resembled swans was breath-taking.
Judges Robin Cousins, Karen Barber and Nicky Slater were emotional as well as the main duo, Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean, who danced both a new number together and their iconic bolero. For me, it was just beyond words to see the Olympic-winning routine live as I remember watching it as a little girl when they won the Gold.
Ray Quinn asked more than once that 'it couldn't be the end' and Chris did cryptically avoid the question of whether there would be more Dancing on Ice, but he did admit that he and Jayne were not retiring and that it wasn't goodbye it was just goodnight. Let's hope so.
A spectacular evening for all the family 10/10
Sunday, 27 April 2014
Saga Magazine Ghost Story Competition, deadline 1 May 2014
My Mum passed along the March issue of Saga magazine to me as it has a Ghost Story Writing Competition running. As the deadline is looming, I thought I would post the details for those followers who may also wish to enter:
Ghost story writing competition
In 1929, the great ghost story author Montague ‘MR’ James identified five key features he thought made them work:
• The pretence of truth
• A pleasing terror
• No gratuitous bloodshed
• No explanation of the machinery
• Setting: those of the writer’s (and reader’s) own day.
• Postal address and email address (if available)
• Your full name
• Date of birth
• The title of your story,
• Contact telephone no(s).
• Your story should be fiction, your own original work, previously unpublished and not already licensed to another publisher.
• Entries should be typed, not handwritten, with pages numbered in sequence.
• The winners will have their stories published in one anthology by Profile Books, subject to full terms and conditions (see below).
• One or more of the winning stories may be featured in an autumn issue of Saga Magazine.
• The competition is open to anyone currently resident in the UK.
• Maximum length of the story is 3,000 words.
• One winner will receive £250, two runners-up £100, and all chosen to be published £100 worth of Profile books.
‘Doubtless, in such a place as this, with its eerie marshes, sudden fogs, moaning winds… any poor old woman might be looked at askance; once upon a time, after all, she would have been branded as a witch.’
The Woman in Black by Susan Hill
‘We have not cared to live in the place ourselves,’ said Lord Canterville, ‘since my grand-aunt, the Dowager Duchess of Bolton, was frightened into a fit, from which she never really recovered, by two skeleton hands being placed on her shoulders as she was dressing for dinner.’
The Canterville Ghost by Oscar Wilde
‘It had found them. Since Eleanor would not open the door, it was going to make its way in… Little pattings came from around the doorframe, small seeking sounds, feeling the edges of the door, trying to sneak a way in.’
The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson
So, over to you…
Ghost story writing competition
Here’s your chance to get published. Pen us a ghost story that chills to the bone – and you could soon see your name on the bookshelves.
Dim the lights, enter the creaking, cobwebby corridors of your mind and get writing
Attention, all short-story writers! Knowing how talented our readers are, Saga Magazine has teamed up with award-winning independent publisher Profile Books to create a book of ghost stories – written exclusively by YOU.
We’re looking for amateur writers to pen a thrilling story of up to 3,000 words to include in a new anthology to be published this autumn – in time for Hallowe’en, if all goes well.
The story judged to be the best by the judges will win £250 and two runners-up £100 each. All those chosen to be in the book will win £100 worth of Profile Books – and everlasting glory, of course.
We’re looking for spine-chillers in any style – humorous, magical, supernatural or just plain terrifying. The choice is yours.
From Edgar Allan Poe, Charles Dickens and Henry James right up to Stephen King and Alice Sebold, the ghost story has a long and celebrated history. Witness the runaway success of Susan Hill’s novella The Woman in Black.
A MORI poll discovered 19% of us claim to have seen a ghost and twice that number believe they exist. Perhaps that’s why ghost stories are so popular in Britain: some 98% of them are written in English. Psychologists suggest that they are a safe, cathartic outlet to purge repressed anxieties. And we Brits are pretty good at repression.
What makes a good ghost story?
In 1929, the great ghost story author Montague ‘MR’ James identified five key features he thought made them work:
• The pretence of truth
• A pleasing terror
• No gratuitous bloodshed
• No explanation of the machinery
• Setting: those of the writer’s (and reader’s) own day.
He had no time for sex, either. ‘Sex is tiresome enough in the novels; in a ghost story, or as the backbone of a ghost story, I have no patience with it. At the same time don’t let us be mild and drab. Malevolence and terror, the glare of evil faces, “the stony grin of unearthly malice”, pursuing forms in darkness, and “long-drawn, distant screams”, are all in place, and so is a modicum of blood, shed with deliberation and carefully husbanded.’
Here’s how to enter our great ghost story competition
Entries can be submitted by email: sagacompetition@profilebooks.com
Or by post: Saga Ghost Stories Competition, Profile Books Limited,
3a Exmouth House, Pine Street,
London EC1R 0JH.
Include a covering note giving:
Or by post: Saga Ghost Stories Competition, Profile Books Limited,
3a Exmouth House, Pine Street,
London EC1R 0JH.
Include a covering note giving:
• Postal address and email address (if available)
• Your full name
• Date of birth
• The title of your story,
• Contact telephone no(s).
• Your story should be fiction, your own original work, previously unpublished and not already licensed to another publisher.
• Entries should be typed, not handwritten, with pages numbered in sequence.
• The winners will have their stories published in one anthology by Profile Books, subject to full terms and conditions (see below).
• One or more of the winning stories may be featured in an autumn issue of Saga Magazine.
• The competition is open to anyone currently resident in the UK.
• Maximum length of the story is 3,000 words.
• One winner will receive £250, two runners-up £100, and all chosen to be published £100 worth of Profile books.
For a printed version, send a stamped self-addressed envelope to Saga Ghost Story T&C Request, Saga Magazine, Enbrook Park, Folkestone, Kent CT20 3SE.
Closing date is May 1, 2014
Closing date is May 1, 2014
Judging panel
- Andrew Franklin, MD, Profile Books
- Katy Bravery, Editor, Saga Magazine
- Emma Soames, Editor at Large, Saga Magazine
Some words to inspire…
‘Doubtless, in such a place as this, with its eerie marshes, sudden fogs, moaning winds… any poor old woman might be looked at askance; once upon a time, after all, she would have been branded as a witch.’
The Woman in Black by Susan Hill
‘We have not cared to live in the place ourselves,’ said Lord Canterville, ‘since my grand-aunt, the Dowager Duchess of Bolton, was frightened into a fit, from which she never really recovered, by two skeleton hands being placed on her shoulders as she was dressing for dinner.’
The Canterville Ghost by Oscar Wilde
‘It had found them. Since Eleanor would not open the door, it was going to make its way in… Little pattings came from around the doorframe, small seeking sounds, feeling the edges of the door, trying to sneak a way in.’
The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson
So, over to you…
Dim the lights, enter the creaking, cobwebby corridors of your mind and get writing!
Saturday, 26 April 2014
Yorkshire Writers newsletter
I thought my followers would be interested in seeing the latest Yorkshire Writers newsletter:
|
||||
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)